Prof. David Shambaugh |
Said David Shambaugh, Professor of Political Science and
International Affairs and Director, China Policy Program, in his book
"China Goes Global: The Partial Power," published by Oxford University Press on April 29, 2013.
Concerned by the academic profession's tendency to
"know more and more about less and less" and its increasing inability
to generalize about China's development in all aspects, Prof. Shambaugh
undertook the project of writing this book in 2007. As a scholar he felt it his
obligation to explain the rise of China which is the big story of the present
era. His book is intended to provide better understanding of the
"forest" unlike most of the available China studies that give more
information about the "trees."
Prof. Shambaugh says
that the straightforward answer to big
questions and speculations arising from China's rise lies in his book's subtitle:
China is The Partial Power. His study reveals that the elements of China's
global power are actually surprisingly weak and very uneven. He goes on to say
that "China is not as important, and it is certainly not as influential,
as conventional wisdom holds." Not impressed by China's rise, Prof.
Shambaugh, claims that his book is not so much about China's rise as its
spread. Most other 'China rise" books are usually based on economic and
military studies and comparisons and focus on the conflict between the
principal established power (the United States) and the challenging rising
power (China).
He has dismissed the "China threat' as a hype. He also
disagrees with observers who have already assumed that China will "rule
the world.' His view is that such a scenario is not only very much overstated
but totally incorrect. According to him China has a very long way to go before
it becomes — if it ever becomes — a true global power. And it will never
"rule the world." His book reveals that China does have an
increasingly broad "footprint" across the globe but lacks the
required depth. China's presence varies substantially by sector and region and
the nation's strengths are not as strong as they seem on face value. He
describes China's appeal, as a "model" for other nations to emulate,
as 'weak to nonexistent.'
Prof. Shambaugh calls China a 'lonely power' without close
friends and allies. China's closest state-to-state relationship with Russia,
Pakistan, and North Korea, which appears harmonious, is fraught with hidden
lack of trust. China, in spite of being a member of most international
organizations, is not very active. It often stands aside or remains passive
when issues concerning international security and global governance have to be
dealt with. In such situations, China often makes known what it is against, but
rarely what it is for. China never tries to resolve any global problem
proactively and positively. Instead, it tries to influence events through
nonaction or negative action and passive diplomacy as clear in its stand on
issues related with North Korea, Iran, Syria, climate change etc. Prof. Shambaugh
highlights China's role in perpetuating global problems by exercising vetoes in
the UN Security Council or in supporting dictatorial regimes against Western
will by teaming up with Russia and others what might be called as
"coalitions of the unwilling."
The findings of Prof. Shambaugh demonstrate that China lacks
real global power. Prof. Shambaugh is willing to accept China a global actor
without (yet) being a true global power. Prof. Shambaugh follows Harvard
Professor Joseph Nye's definition of power - Power is the ability of A to make
B do what it would otherwise not do. Merely, resources do not constitute power
unless they are used to try to influence the outcome of a situation. The
essence of power lies in the conversion of resources into influence, which is
the exercise of power. Prof. Shambaugh's study shows that China does not have
any real influence on global events except in a very few limited areas of trade
and commerce. China is quite active in various parts across the globe but its
activities are mainly restricted to trade and commerce including, however,
several sensitive sectors like energy, telecommunication, mining and
infrastructure. But Prof. Shambaugh's findings indicate that China is not yet
influencing or shaping actors or events.
China's global image remains mixed and the majority of the
world is very ambivalent about China's rise. This is clear from two major
studies carried out annually - one by the Pew (Pew Research Center) and another by BBC (BBC Poll : Attitude towards countries). The two
studies when combined provide a clear view of China's global image. In his
study, Prof. Shambaugh has quoted a prominent International Relations scholar saying:
"There is a combination of insecurity and arrogance in China's behavior at
present — insecure at home and arrogant abroad. The government is insecure
about a lot of things, so there is an increase in domestic controls.
Externally, there is a kind of overconfidence of China's position in the world
and a strong reluctance to get involved in foreign entanglements." This
perhaps explains China's present dilemma.
Professor Shambaugh is an internationally recognized
authority and author on contemporary China and the international relations of
Asia, with a strong interest in the European Union and transatlantic issues. He
is a frequent commentator in international media, and has contributed to
leading scholarly journals such as International Security, Foreign Affairs, The
China Quarterly, and The China Journal. (Watch Prof. Shambaugh speaking on "China Goes Global: The Partial Power")